Judge in SEC’s Civil Case Against Ripple Labs to Initiate Jury Trial in Second Quarter of 2024
In a significant development within the ongoing legal battle between Ripple Labs and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), two high-ranking executives of the blockchain technology company have been slated for a jury trial. The court filing, dated August 9, reveals that Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse and co-founder Chris Larsen are poised to undergo the legal crucible in the second quarter of 2024.
The case revolves around allegations made by the SEC, asserting that the executives played a pivotal role in conducting illicit securities offerings involving the XRP token. The regulatory agency also claimed that they facilitated Ripple’s alleged regulatory breaches, some of which were later contested. This impending jury trial promises to be a critical juncture in the protracted legal saga, with far-reaching implications for the cryptocurrency industry at large.

Court documents submitted on August 9 to the U.S. District Court located within the Southern District of New York
The filing further mandates the involved parties, including Ripple’s executives and the SEC, to submit their blackout dates by August 23. Moreover, a slew of pretrial filings, due by December 4, encompass essential motions in limine – legal maneuvers aimed at excluding specific evidence from the trial. Responses to these motions are anticipated by December 18.
Central to the case is the pivotal question of whether Garlinghouse and Larsen exhibited knowledge or reckless disregard for facts pertaining to securities regulations. Additionally, the extent to which they abetted any violations attributed to Ripple is under scrutiny. The intricacies of this legal contention have been exacerbated by Ripple’s deliberate distancing from the XRP Ledger and Chris Larsen’s evolving role within the Ripple ecosystem.
The court’s decision to grant the executives a jury trial hinged on the determination that a reasonable panel of jurors could potentially conclude that the alleged actions were not committed by Garlinghouse and Larsen. This legal course of action carries echoes for other ongoing cases in the cryptocurrency space, as evidenced by Coinbase’s reference to Judge Torres’ ruling on XRP in their motion to dismiss a separate lawsuit from the SEC on August 4.
Nevertheless, a stark contrast emerges from the stance taken by another judge overseeing the SEC’s litigation against Terraform Labs, who largely dismissed the Ripple case ruling on July 31. This duality in judicial perspectives underscores the complexity of navigating the regulatory landscape surrounding digital assets.
The lawsuit, initiated by the SEC in December 2020, sent shockwaves through the cryptocurrency market, prompting numerous exchanges to delist XRP in an attempt to preempt similar legal entanglements. However, the situation has been in flux since Judge Torres’ decision on July 13, as a multitude of firms have hastened to relist the XRP token or explore the possibility of doing so.
The ripple effect of these legal proceedings is not isolated, as several prominent figures within the cryptocurrency realm are facing both civil and criminal charges within the United States. In tandem with the cases against Coinbase and Binance, former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried and former Celsius Network CEO Alex Mashinsky have also been arrested on criminal charges, amid allegations of defrauding customers.
Read more:
- Ripple’s Resurgence: Re-Engaging The U.S. Market Post Court Ruling On XRP
- Ripple Labs Releases 1 Billion XRP Amidst Ongoing SEC Legal Battle
- SEC Pursues Interlocutory Appeal In Ongoing Legal Battle Against Ripple Labs