Hester Peirce disappointed with SEC’s fine $200,000 fine on Coinschedule without explanation which token was securities

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) settled charges against British company Blotics, the operators of Coinschedule.com, a once-popular website that profiled offerings of digital asset securities. They were found to have violated the anti-touting provisions of the federal securities laws by failing to disclose the compensation it received from issuers of the cryptocurrency securities it profiled.

hester-peirce-disappointed-with-secs-fine-200000-fine-on-coinschedule-without-explanation-which-token-was-securities

Source: SEC

The SEC asserts that Coinschedule violated anti-touting provisions of U.S. securities laws

Coinschedule.com is a fairly popular website that received a lot of visits from customers in the United States during the period from 2016 to August 2019.

Visitors to Coinschedule.com were provided with detailed information about over 2,500 ICO projects and their tokens. This includes “trust scores” to help users claim to assess the credibility and operational risk of each offering using a proprietary algorithm.

But the SEC thinks that Coinschedule only receives money and speaks well for the project, but does not research and consciously protect investors.

“In reality, the token issuers paid Coinschedule to profile their token offerings on Coinschedule.com, a fact that Coinschedule failed to disclose to visitors”, SEC stated.

Coinschedule.com published many of the profiles after the SEC issued its DAO Report in 2017 warning that coins sold in ICOs may be securities and that those who offer and sell securities in the U.S. must comply with federal securities laws. And they also persisted with promoting the reviews without proper compensation disclosure even after public warnings that those promoting a virtual token or security must disclose the nature, scope, and amount of compensation received in exchange for the promotion.

“As the SEC’s order finds, Coinschedule presented potential investors with seemingly independent profiles about token offerings when in fact they were bought and paid for by token issuers,” said Kristina Littman, chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Cyber Unit. “The securities law prohibiting touting securities for compensation without appropriate disclosures to investors is clear and longstanding.”

Coinschedule agreed to cease and desist from committing or causing any future violations of the anti-touting provisions of the federal securities laws without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings. They will pay $43,000 in disgorgement, plus prejudgment interest, and a penalty of $154,434.

However, not everyone at the SEC was happy with the conclusion of the case. SEC Commissioners Hester Peirce and Elad Roisman wrote a letter criticizing the commission for failing to specifically explain which projects touted by Coinschedule are actually securities.

hester-peirce-disappointed-with-secs-fine-200000-fine-on-coinschedule-without-explanation-which-token-was-securities

SEC Commissioners Hester Peirce with the nick name “Crypto Mom”

The commissioners described the omission as “symptomatic of our reluctance to provide additional guidance about how to determine whether a token is being sold as part of a securities offering or which tokens are securities.”

“There is a decided lack of clarity for market participants around the application of the securities laws to digital assets and their trading, as is evidenced by the requests each of us receives for clarity and the consistent outreach to the Commission staff for no-action and other relief.”

They recognized that although the Commission staff has provided some guidance, the large number of factors and absence of weighting cut against the clarity the guidance was intended to offer. Market participants have difficulty getting a lawyer to sign off that something is not a securities offering or does not implicate the securities laws; they also cannot get a clear answer, backed by a clear Commission-level statement, that something is a securities offering.

And finally, they concluded that the Commission has to engage more.

Read more: 

Follow us on Telegram

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on Facebook

 

You might also like

LATEST NEWS

LASTEST NEWS