FTX co-founder Gary Wang Faces Grilling Over $300 Million Alameda Research Loans in Bankman-Fried Trial

Lawyers representing Sam Bankman-Fried are pushing to question FTX co-founder Gary Wang about the nature of personal loans he received from Alameda Research during Bankman-Fried’s ongoing trial. These loans, estimated to be worth hundreds of millions of dollars, have become a focal point in the legal battle, raising questions about their legitimacy and the involvement of legal professionals in their structuring.

The trial, which has garnered significant attention in the cryptocurrency and financial worlds, centers around allegations related to financial transactions and the alleged concealment of funds. Prosecutors have been relentless in their pursuit of answers, particularly regarding the substantial loans Wang received from Alameda Research. Bankman-Fried’s legal team asserts that these loans were legitimate and structured with the involvement of legal professionals, challenging the notion that they were merely a ruse to obscure the true origin of the funds.

Gary Wang

During a pivotal moment in the trial last week, prosecutors seized the opportunity to interrogate Gary Wang about the series of personal loans he received from Alameda Research. The loans, reportedly ranging between $200 and $300 million, served various purposes, including financing FTX’s venture investments and facilitating the acquisition of a property in the Bahamas by Wang himself. Notably, Gary Wang was not only a co-founder of FTX but also held a significant role at Alameda Research and had a longstanding friendship with Sam Bankman-Fried.

Bankman-Fried’s legal team wasted no time in responding to Wang’s testimony. In a filing submitted on Monday night, they expressed their intent to inquire further into the nature of these loans, seeking specific details about the attorneys who played a role in their structuring. They aim to ascertain which legal professionals were involved, the documents they prepared in relation to these loans, and whether Wang had any reservations or concerns when he signed the agreements.

“Mr. Wang’s understanding that these were actual loans – structured by lawyers and memorialized in formal promissory notes that imposed real interest payment obligations – is relevant to rebut the inference that these were simply sham loans directed by Mr. Bankman-Fried to conceal the source of the funds,” Bankman-Fried’s legal team argued in their filing, underscoring the significance of these inquiries.

Read more:

Join us on Telegram

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Reddit

You might also like