1inch Co-founder Confused by MetaMask’s Authority to Withhold Taxes

The cryptocurrency community has been left bewildered yet again, this time by an update concerning withholding taxes on MetaMask. Anton Bukov, the co-founder of 1inch, recently voiced his concerns about the revised tax terms of service on the popular digital wallet through a series of tweets.

The revised MetaMask Terms of Use, provided by ConsenSys, were introduced in April 2023, outlining the guidelines for using the service. Of particular interest was section 4.3, which addressed tax obligations. According to this section, the responsibility of identifying and complying with government-imposed taxes lies with both the user and MetaMask.

Additionally, the terms stated that any fees paid to MetaMask would exclude taxes, unless explicitly stated otherwise. This statement led to confusion among investors who wondered what exactly MetaMask meant by the phrase, “We reserve the right to deduct withholding tax.”

Essentially, this means that MetaMask has the authority to withhold tax if required by law. However, given that MetaMask is primarily a cryptocurrency wallet offering digital asset management through browser extensions and mobile apps, users questioned the necessity of such a provision. The platform also offers browser compatibility for NFTs, the latest addition to its services.

It is worth noting that the burden of paying relevant taxes typically falls on the investors themselves since MetaMask’s decentralized exchange (DEX) algorithm operates across multiple jurisdictions and is fully automated.

Nonetheless, MetaMask clarified that wallet providers may deduct taxes at a reasonable rate from payments or transactions, should it be deemed applicable. In such cases, the platform would assume responsibility for the withholding tax.

This recent controversy surrounding MetaMask comes on the heels of another incident last month. ConsenSys, the company behind MetaMask, reported a data breach where MetaMask users’ personal details were compromised due to a hack of their third-party customer service providers. This breach caused significant concern within the community.

As confusion prevails regarding MetaMask’s updated tax terms, users and investors are eagerly seeking clarification from the platform. It remains to be seen how MetaMask will address these concerns and whether any amendments will be made to alleviate the confusion surrounding its tax policies.

Read more:

Join us on Telegram

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Reddit

You might also like