It seems the whole cryptocurrency community is too bored with Craig Wright ridiculous tricks. Therefore, today, a long list of 145 addresses and signatures of owners of Bitcoin mined in the first years, has confirmed Wright as a liar.
Someone just signed a message calling Craig a fraud from 145 addresses Craig claimed were his in the Tulip Trust.
I verified the first few addresses on the list, and their signatures and presence on Craig’s list checks out.https://t.co/gwTy8GcmiF pic.twitter.com/4hHCKr8NCA
— Zectro (@Zectro1) May 25, 2020
145 wallets with Bitcoin mined in its first years calls Craig Wright a liar and a fraud
The message calling Wright a crook has the following content:
“Craig Steven Wright is a liar and a fraud. He doesn’t have the keys used to sign this message. The Lightning Network is a significant achievement. However, we need to continue work on improving on-chain capacity. Unfortunately, the solution is not to just change a constant in the code or to allow powerful participants to force out others.”
Moreover, it is essential that all of the addresses can be found among the list of thousands exported by Craig Wright in the case against Ira Kleiman.
Craig Wright – the Australian tech entrepreneur who controversially claims to be bitcoin’s pseudonymous inventor, Satoshi Nakamoto
Recently, as AZCoin News reported, the lawsuit between a developer Dave Kleiman and Craig Wright continued to develop with new details when it was suggested that the Court should enter case-terminating sanctions for repeated lies, deceit, and perjury. There is a high probability that the case will be expanded based on the Court’s assessment of Wright’s behavior, as opposed to who is right or wrong. Because perhaps Wright caused too much trouble just because of his lies.
Wright has repeatedly failed to present evidence of property rights allegedly by Satoshi Nakamoto. Meanwhile, all he has to do is sign a message with the cryptographic private key of the wallet in question, which can be checked with the public key.
This proves that Wright tried to evade every occasion that he would be forced to prove ownership. As a result, many people in the community suspect that he doesn’t really own those bitcoins.
The signed message bears some similarity to a 2015 message coming from Satoshi’s email address, saying “I am not Craig Wright. We are all Satoshi.”
So, what happens to Wright?
Kleiman’s case is entirely based on the assumption that Wright is Satoshi, who will allow Irina Kleiman to occupy half of that Bitcoin.
Wright was charged with perjury and forging documents, and the early miners’ activities put him in a difficult position when he continued to claim that he was Satoshi.
It is becoming increasingly clear that Wright does not have access to those coins, which will disable the long-running case, which was put to the test on July 6.
It seems that in the future, Wright will respond to all these with angry expressions and even sue the plaintiffs. Hopefully, the Court will decide that the fraud has been taking too long and announce the end of the case as soon as possible.
Read more:
- XRPL Labs Developed The Banking App Xumm Which Is Intended To Be An Alternative To The Traditional Bank Account
- Users Of Ledger And Trezor Hardware Wallets Could Be At Risk After A Hacker Offered To Sell Personal Information